4.3 Review

Evaluating the implementation of cervical cancer screening programs in low-resource settings globally: a systematized review

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages 417-429

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-020-01290-4

Keywords

Cervical cancer screening; Implementation; Literature review; Prevention

Funding

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Prevention Research Centers Program [1U48DP005026-01S1, 1U48DP005010-01S1, 1U48DP005023-01S1]
  2. US. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through the Prevention Research Centers Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Cervical cancer disproportionately burdens low-resource populations where access to quality screening services is limited. A greater understanding of sustainable approaches to implement cervical cancer screening services is needed. Methods We conducted a systematized literature review of evaluations from cervical cancer screening programs implemented in resource-limited settings globally that included a formal evaluation and intention of program sustainment over time. We categorized the included studies using the continuum of implementation research framework which categorizes studies progressively from implementation light to more implementation intensive. Results Fifty-one of 13,330 initially identified papers were reviewed with most study sites in low-resource settings of middle-income countries (94.1%) ,while 9.8% were in low-income countries. Across all studies, visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (58.8%) was the most prevalent screening method followed by cytology testing (39.2%). Demand-side (client and community) considerations were reported in 86.3% of the articles, while 68.6% focused scientific inquiry on the supply side (health service). Eighteen articles (35.3%) were categorized as Informing Scale-up along the continuum of implementation research. Conclusions The number of cervical cancer screening implementation reports is limited globally, especially in low-income countries. The 18 papers we classified as Informing Scale-up provide critical insights for developing programs relevant to implementation outcomes. We recommend that program managers report lessons learnt to build collective implementation knowledge for cervical cancer screening services, globally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available