4.6 Article

Identification of CELSR2 as a novel prognostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

BMC CANCER
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06813-5

Keywords

CELSR2; Prognosis; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Biomarker

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation Regional Science Fund of China [81760112]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2017b020247057]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou [201804010211]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundCELSR2 is postulated to be a receptor involved in contact-mediated communication; however, the specific function of this particular member has not been determined in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsHere, we explored the expression and function of CELSR2 in HCC patients through data mining and examined the results using clinical samples and in vitro experiments.ResultsIt was found that CELSR2 mRNA and protein expression levels were significantly higher in cancerous tissue than in normal tissue. The increased mRNA expression of CELSR2 was significantly associated with overall survival (OS) in HCC patients. Moreover, the genetic alteration rate of CELSR2 gene in HCC can reach 8%, and these alterations would deeply influence its neighboring genes, then jointly affecting the occurrence and development of tumor through cell adhesion and numerous common carcinogenic pathways. Our in vitro results indicated that the depletion of CELSR2 inhibited liver cancer cell proliferation and invasion. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that CELSR2 could be viewed as an independent risk factor for HCC patients.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that data mining could efficiently reveal the roles of CELSR2 in HCC and its potential regulatory networks. The CELSR2 protein level may serve as a novel prognostic biomarker for HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available