4.4 Article

Method development and validation of LC-MS/MS-based assay for the simultaneous quantitation of trastuzumab and pertuzumab in cynomolgus monkey serum and its application in pharmacokinetic study

Journal

BIOMEDICAL CHROMATOGRAPHY
Volume 34, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.4903

Keywords

antibody cocktail; LC-MS; MS; method validation; pharmacokinetic; quantitative analysis

Funding

  1. National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for Significant New Drugs Development [2020ZX09201026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a simple and robust LC-MS/MS assay for the simultaneous quantitation of an antibody cocktail of trastuzumab and pertuzumab in monkey serum. The LC-MS/MS method saved costs, decreased the analysis time, and reduced quantitative times relative to the traditional ligand-binding assays. The serum samples were digested with trypsin at 50 degrees C for 60 min after methanol precipitation, ammonium bicarbonate denaturation, dithiothreitol reduction, and iodoacetamide alkylation. The tryptic peptides were chromatographically separated using a C18 column (2.1 x 50 mm, 2.6 mu m) with mobile phases of 0.1% formic acid in water and acetonitrile. The other monoclonal antibody, infliximab, was used as internal standards to minimize the variability during sample processing and detection. A unique peptide for each monoclonal antibody was simultaneously quantified using LC-MS/MS in the multiple reaction monitoring mode. Calibration curves were linear from 2.0 to 400 mu g/mL. The intra- and inter-assay precision (%CV) was within 8.9 and 7.4% (except 10.4 and 15.1% for lower limit of quantitation), respectively, and the accuracy (%Dev) was within +/- 13.1%. The other validation parameters were evaluated, and all results met the acceptance criteria of the international guiding principles. Finally, the method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetics study after a single-dose intravenous drip administration to cynomolgus monkeys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available