4.4 Article

Immigration does not offset harvest mortality in groups of a cooperatively breeding carnivore

Journal

ANIMAL CONSERVATION
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 750-761

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acv.12593

Keywords

Canis lupus; compensatory immigration; cooperative breeder; dispersal; gray wolf; social structure

Funding

  1. Alberta Conservation Association
  2. Alberta Environment and Parks
  3. Alberta Innovates BioSolutions
  4. Coypu Foundation
  5. George and Mildred Cirica Student Support Fund Scholarship at The University of Montana
  6. Eppley Foundation for Scientific Research
  7. Leonard X. Bosack and Bette M. Kruger Foundation
  8. Oregon Zoo Future for Wildlife grants
  9. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Association
  10. Mountaineers Foundation
  11. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  12. Wolf Recovery Foundation
  13. University of Idaho Environmental Science Program
  14. Bernice Barbour Foundation
  15. Wilburforce Foundation
  16. Shikar Safari Club International
  17. Steven Leuthold Family Foundation
  18. Idaho Department of Fish and Game
  19. Kampe Foundation
  20. Nancy Carroll Draper Foundation
  21. Nez Perce Tribe
  22. Regina Bauer Frankenberg Foundation for Animal Welfare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of harvest on cooperatively breeding species are often more complex than simply subtracting the number of animals that died from the group count. Changes in demographic rates, particularly dispersal, could offset some effects of harvest mortality in groups but this is rarely explored with cooperative breeders. We asked whether a cooperatively breeding species known for long-distance dispersal could compensate for the effect of harvest mortality on density by adopting immigrants into the group. We used genetic samples to estimate the minimum density of gray wolves (Canis lupus) and proportion of immigrants in groups in the northern US Rocky Mountains after an annual harvest regime was initiated and in the Canadian Rocky Mountains where wolves were managed consistently under an annual harvest regime. We tested whether immigration (1) compensated, (2) partially compensated or (3) did not compensate numerically for harvest mortality in groups and hypothesized immigration would increase with increasing harvest intensity. Density of wolves in groups declined after harvest was initiated whereas immigration into groups was consistently low and did not change with harvest in the US study area. Immigration into groups was similarly low and density even lower in the Canadian study area compared to the US study area. Our results indicate immigration did not compensate for harvest mortality in groups in two separate populations of a cooperatively breeding carnivore. We hypothesize the social structure of wolf groups may limit the potentially compensatory response of immigration in some populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available