4.8 Article

Strain relaxation and resonance of carbon nanotube forests under electrostatic loading

Journal

CARBON
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 250-258

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.09.038

Keywords

Capacitance; Carbon nanotubes forests; Electrostatic force; Resonance; Strain relaxation

Funding

  1. Department of Energy Office of Basic Sciences [DE-SC0004927]
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences under NSF award [DMR-1332208]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrostatic loading is widely used for sensing and actuation in miniaturized electromechanical systems, yet classical designs involve geometric patterning of solid materials such as silicon and metal films. Conductive nanoporous materials for electrostatics may enable engineering of new functionalities arising from their compliance, internal surface forces, and high surface area. Toward this end, we investigate the response of vertically aligned carbon nanotube (CNT) forests to DC and AC electrostatic loads. First, the tensile strain-stress characteristics of patterned CNT forests was determined in a non-contact manner by cyclic DC electrostatic loading, revealing an increase of the effective Young's modulus with sequential load cycling. Next, we observed resonance can be excited by AC electrostatic loading, and that the resonance frequency increases with sequential sweeps of the AC load frequency. Both the DC and AC measurements indicate that residual stress that arises during CNT growth is relaxed upon electrostatic loading, causing stiffening of the structure. This study shows for the first time that CNT forests can function as bulk electrostatic elements, and their intrinsic low stiffness and quality factor may be suitable for development of wide bandwidth micro-resonators and adsorption-based sensors. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available