4.6 Article

Multimode Operating Performance Visualization and Nonoptimal Cause Identification

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr8010123

Keywords

multimode process; performance assessment; subtractive clustering; multi-space principal component analysis; self-organizing map

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0303401]
  2. National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [61725301]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61803158, 61873093]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [222201814047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the traditional performance assessment method, different modes of data are classified mainly by expert knowledge. Thus, human interference is highly probable. The traditional method is also incapable of distinguishing transition data from steady-state data, which reduces the accuracy of the monitor model. To solve these problems, this paper proposes a method of multimode operating performance visualization and nonoptimal cause identification. First, multimode data identification is realized by subtractive clustering algorithm (SCA), which can reduce human influence and eliminate transition data. Then, the multi-space principal component analysis (MsPCA) is used to characterize the independent characteristics of different datasets, which enhances the robustness of the model with respect to the performance of independent variables. Furthermore, a self-organizing map (SOM) is used to train these characteristics and map them into a two-dimensional plane, by which the visualization of the process monitor is realized. For the online assessment, the operating performance of the current process is evaluated according to the projection position of the data on the visual model. Then, the cause of the nonoptimal performance is identified. Finally, the Tennessee Eastman (TE) process is used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available