4.7 Article

Buckling behavior of additively manufactured cellular columns: Experimental and simulation validation

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 186, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108349

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; Lattice structure, design and optimization; Unit cell; Critical buckling load; Post-buckling behavior

Funding

  1. High-Speed 3D Printing Research Center from the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lattice structures have been used in a variety of engineering applications in aerospace, automobile and biomedical applications. In this study, the buckling analysis of additively manufactured cellular columns was conducted. The effect of unit cell size and height of the column on the critical buckling load and post-bucking behavior of compressive columns constructed with periodic cubic structure was investigated using experimental and simulation-based studies. The results exhibited that the unit cell size and cellular column height significantly affect the critical buckling load while the total mass, volume fraction, and column dimensions remain the same. The critical buckling load increases with the increase of unit cell size or decrease of cellular column height. The largest unit cell size (8.72 mm) has the maximum critical buckling load, followed by unit cell sizes of 4.74 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively. Moreover, the failure of cellular columns having larger height-to-width (h/w) ratio, happens due to global buckling, whereas, local bucking dominates for smaller h/w ratios. Additionally, it was found that the unit cell size significantly affects on the post-buckling behavior; the samples of larger unit cells failed in a brittle manner and this trend continuously changed from brittle to ductile as the unit cell size reduces. (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available