4.1 Article

Comparative effectiveness of nivolumab versus clinical practice for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 103-114

Publisher

Becaris Publishing
DOI: 10.2217/cer-2019-0145

Keywords

gastric cancer; nivolumab; propensity scores; real-world evidence; simulated treatment comparison

Funding

  1. National Health Service

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To determine the effectiveness of nivolumab compared with routine clinical practice (RCP) for patients with gastric or gastroesophageal cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, two or more previous regimens, using real-world electronic patient records from a US population, a single-arm trial (CheckMate 032) and a randomized controlled trial in an Asian setting (ATTRACTION-2). Materials & methods: A simulated treatment comparison was conducted to predict overall survival for patients treated with nivolumab compared with RCP in the USA. Results: Results of the indirect simulated treatment comparison suggest that nivolumab is associated with a 50% reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality relative to RCP (Hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.68). Conclusion: The survival benefit of nivolumab may extend more generally to the USA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available