4.5 Article

Associations of Apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 Genotype and Ball Heading With Verbal Memory in Amateur Soccer Players

Journal

JAMA NEUROLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 4, Pages 419-426

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4828

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [K08 AG054727] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Importance Emerging evidence suggests that long-term exposure to ball heading in soccer, the most popular sport in the world, confers risk for adverse cognitive outcomes. However, the extent to which the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE epsilon 4) allele, a common risk factor for neurodegeneration, and ball heading are associated with cognition in soccer players remains unknown. Objective To determine whether the APOE epsilon 4 allele and 12-month ball heading exposure are associated with verbal memory in a cohort of adult amateur soccer players. Design, Settings, and Participants A total of 379 amateur soccer players were enrolled in the longitudinal Einstein Soccer Study from November 11, 2013, through January 23, 2018. Selection criteria included participation in soccer for more than 5 years and for more than 6 months per year. Of the 379 individuals enrolled in the study, 355 were genotyped. Three players were excluded for reporting extreme levels of heading. Generalized estimating equation linear regression models were employed to combine data across visits for a cross-sectional analysis of the data. Exposures At each study visit every 3 to 6 months, players completed the HeadCount 12-Month Questionnaire, a validated, computer-based questionnaire to estimate 12-month heading exposure that was categorized as low (quartiles 1 and 2), moderate (quartile 3), and high (quartile 4). Main Outcome and Measures Verbal memory was assessed at each study visit using the International Shopping List Delayed Recall task from CogState. Results A total of 352 soccer players (256 men and 96 women; median age, 23 years [interquartile range, 21-28 years]) across a total of 1204 visits were analyzed. High levels of heading were associated with worse verbal memory performance (beta = -0.59; 95% CI, -0.93 to -0.25; P = .001). There was no main association of APOE epsilon 4 with verbal memory (beta = 0.09; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.42; P = .58). However, there was a significant association of APOE epsilon 4 and heading with performance on the ISRL task (chi(2) = 7.22; P = .03 for overall interaction). In APOE epsilon 4-positive players, poorer verbal memory associated with high vs low heading exposure was 4.1-fold greater (APOE epsilon 4 negative, beta = -0.36; 95% CI, -0.75 to 0.03; APOE epsilon 4 positive, beta = -1.49; 95% CI, -2.05 to -0.93), and poorer verbal memory associated with high vs moderate heading exposure was 8.5-fold greater (APOE epsilon 4 negative, beta = -0.13; 95% CI, -0.54 to 0.29; APOE epsilon 4 positive, beta = -1.11, 95% CI, -1.70 to -0.53) compared with that in APOE epsilon 4-negative players. Conclusions and Relevance This study suggests that the APOE epsilon 4 allele is a risk factor for worse memory performance associated with higher heading exposure in the prior year, which highlights that assessing genetic risks may ultimately play a role in promoting safer soccer play. This cross-sectional study examines whether the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele and 12-month ball heading exposure are associated with verbal memory in a cohort of adult amateur soccer players. Question Are apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 status and ball heading associated with verbal memory? Findings In this cross-sectional analysis of 352 amateur soccer players, those with greater exposure to ball heading in the prior 12 months and the apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 allele demonstrated worse verbal memory than players with low exposure to ball heading. Meaning The findings from this study provide evidence to suggest that apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 is a genetic risk factor for cognitive impairment associated with the high levels of long-term ball heading.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available