4.7 Article

Nonpeaked Discriminant Analysis for Data Representation

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2944869

Keywords

Cutting L-norm distance; data classification; discriminant analysis; robustness

Funding

  1. Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund [CAFYBB2019QD003]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [61871444]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0820601]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20171453, BK20170033]
  5. National Science Foundations of China [61672365, 61772277, 61773117, 61772275]
  6. Qinglan and Six Talent Peaks Projects of Jiangsu Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Of late, there are many studies on the robust discriminant analysis, which adopt L-1-norm as the distance metric, but their results are not robust enough to gain universal acceptance. To overcome this problem, the authors of this article present a nonpeaked discriminant analysis (NPDA) technique, in which cutting L-1-norm is adopted as the distance metric. As this kind of norm can better eliminate heavy outliers in learning models, the proposed algorithm is expected to be stronger in performing feature extraction tasks for data representation than the existing robust discriminant analysis techniques, which are based on the L-1-norm distance metric. The authors also present a comprehensive analysis to show that cutting L-1-norm distance can be computed equally well, using the difference between two special convex functions. Against this background, an efficient iterative algorithm is designed for the optimization of the proposed objective. Theoretical proofs on the convergence of the algorithm are also presented. Theoretical insights and effectiveness of the proposed method are validated by experimental tests on several real data sets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available