4.6 Article

Predicted Brain Age After Stroke

Journal

FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00348

Keywords

age prediction; structural magnetic resonance imaging; stroke; chronological age; brain age

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [APP1020526]
  2. Brain Foundation
  3. Wicking Trust
  4. Collie Trust
  5. Australian Research Council [DE180100893]
  6. University Research Priority Program Dynamics of Healthy Aging of the University of Zurich
  7. Sidney and Fiona Myer Family Foundation
  8. Australian Research Council [DE180100893] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aging is a known non-modifiable risk factor for stroke. Usually, this refers to chronological rather than biological age. Biological brain age can be estimated based on cortical and subcortical brain measures. For stroke patients, it could serve as a more sensitive marker of brain health than chronological age. In this study, we investigated whether there is a difference in brain age between stroke survivors and control participants matched on chronological age. We estimated brain age at 3 months after stroke, and then followed the longitudinal trajectory over three time-points: within 6 weeks (baseline), at 3 and at 12 months following their clinical event. We found that brain age in stroke participants was higher compared to controls, with the mean difference between the groups varying between 3.9 and 8.7 years depending on the brain measure used for prediction. This difference in brain age was observed at 6 weeks after stroke and maintained at 3 and 12 months after stroke. The presence of group differences already at baseline suggests that stroke might be an ultimate manifestation of gradual cerebrovascular burden accumulation and brain degeneration. Brain age prediction, therefore, has the potential to be a useful biomarker for quantifying stroke risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available