4.6 Article

Perspective: Time to Resolve Confusion on Folate Amounts, Units, and Forms in Prenatal Supplements

Journal

ADVANCES IN NUTRITION
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 753-759

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmaa017

Keywords

folate; L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate; prenatal supplements; DRIs; folate recommendations; folate Daily Values; folate labeling

Funding

  1. Office of Dietary Supplements, NIH
  2. Intramural Research Program, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Folate-containing prenatal supplements are commonly consumed in the United States, but inconsistencies in units of measure and chemical forms pose challenges for providing authoritative advice on recommended amounts. New regulations require folate to be declared as micrograms of dietary folate equivalents (DR) on product labels, whereas intake recommendations for reducing the risk of neural tube defects (NTDs) and the Tolerable Upper Intake Level are expressed as micrograms of folic acid. Today, >25% of prenatal supplements contain folate as synthetic salts of L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate (L-5-MTHF), but recommendations do not include this form of the vitamin. Harmonizing units of measure and addressing newer forms of folate salts in intake recommendations and in the prevention of NTDs would resolve the confusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available