4.7 Review

Long non-coding RNA MALAT1 as a valuable biomarker for prognosis in osteosarcoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 72, Issue -, Pages 206-213

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.004

Keywords

Long non-coding RNA; MALAT1; Osteosarcoma; Prognosis; Meta-analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772403, 81660317]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Long non-coding RNA metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (lncRNA, MALAT1) has been found to be aberrantly expressed in osteosarcoma, while high MALAT1 expression is correlated with both metastasis and prognosis. This meta-analysis set out to investigate the prognostic value of lncRNA MALAT1 in patients living with osteosarcoma. Methods: We conducted a systematical search of available databases from inception to May 2019. Odds ratios (OR) of clinical parameters, as well as hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS), were calculated in order to evaluate the relationship between MALAT1 expression and the prognosis of patients living with osteosarcoma. Results: Nine eligible studies which included a total of 599 osteosarcoma patients were enrolled in the present study. Pooled results found that high MALAT1 expression was associated with clinical stage and distant metastasis, but not age, gender, tumor anatomical location or tumor size. When compared to patients with low MALAT1 expression, patients with high MALAT1 expression were markedly correlated with a worse OS. Moreover, MALAT1 may be an independent predictive factor for OS in patients living with osteosarcoma. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that high MALAT1 expression is associated with advanced clinicopathological features as well as unfavorable prognosis. LncRNA MALAT1 has the potential to serve as a moderate prognostic biomarker for osteosarcoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available