4.0 Article

Oral health-related quality of life and associated factors among older people in short-term care

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL HYGIENE
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 163-172

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/idh.12424

Keywords

older people; oral health; Oral health-related quality of life; self-perceived; short-term care

Funding

  1. Orebro County
  2. Regional Research Board of Uppsala-Orebro
  3. Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare (Forte)
  4. Kamprad Family Foundation for Entrepreneurship, Research, and Charity
  5. Swedish Society for Clinical Nutrition
  6. Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives It is well known that oral health status is associated with oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in the general population. The aim of this study was to describe and analyse OHRQoL among older people in short-term care and its associated factors. Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study included 391 older people in 36 short-term care units. Data were collected via clinical oral assessments, questions about self-perceived oral and general health, Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living (Katz-ADL) and the Revised Oral Assessment Guide (ROAG). OHRQoL was measured using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Multivariate logistic regression models were applied in the analysis. Results Poor OHRQoL was reported by 34% of the older people. Associated factors were swallowing problems according to ROAG; quite poor/poor self-perceived physical, psychological and oral health; and being a woman. Conclusions There is an association between OHRQoL and older people's self-perceived health according to the OHIP-14. This indicates the importance of early detection of oral health problems in frail older people and to assess both oral health and swallowing problems among older people in short-term care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available