4.8 Article

Physical and virtual carbon metabolism of global cities

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13757-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [71725005]
  2. Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar of Guangdong Province, China [2018B030306032]
  3. Beijing Outstanding Young Scientist Program [BJJWZYJH01201910027031]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71704015, 71874097, 71961137009]
  5. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA20100104]
  6. National Key Research & Development Program [2016YFA0602304]
  7. Resnick Sustainability Institute at California Institute of Technology
  8. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [JQ19032]
  9. Qiu Shi Science & Technologies Foundation
  10. Czech Science Foundation under the project VEENEX (GA CR) [16-17978S]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban activities have profound and lasting effects on the global carbon balance. Here we develop a consistent metabolic approach that combines two complementary carbon accounts, the physical carbon balance and the fossil fuel-derived gaseous carbon footprint, to track carbon coming into, being added to urban stocks, and eventually leaving the city. We find that over 88% of the physical carbon in 16 global cities is imported from outside their urban boundaries, and this outsourcing of carbon is notably amplified by virtual emissions from upstream activities that contribute 33-68% to their total carbon inflows. While 13-33% of the carbon appropriated by cities is immediately combusted and released as CO2, between 8 and 24% is stored in durable household goods or becomes part of other urban stocks. Inventorying carbon consumed and stored for urban metabolism should be given more credit for the role it can play in stabilizing future global climate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available