4.8 Article

A system wide approach to managing zoo collections for visitor attendance and in situ conservation

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-14303-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Irish Research Council Laureate Awards 2017/2018 [IRCLA/2017/60]
  2. Marie Sklodowska Curie Research Grants Scheme [749594]
  3. Species360
  4. University of Southern Denmark
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [749594] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  6. Irish Research Council (IRC) [IRCLA/2017/60] Funding Source: Irish Research Council (IRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zoos contribute substantial resources to in situ conservation projects in natural habitats using revenue from visitor attendance, as well as other sources. We use a global dataset of over 450 zoos to develop a model of how zoo composition and socio-economic factors directly and indirectly influence visitor attendance and in situ project activity. We find that zoos with many animals, large animals, high species richness (particularly of mammals), and which are dissimilar to other zoos achieve higher numbers of visitors and contribute to more in situ conservation projects. However, the model strongly supports a trade-off between number of animals and body mass indicating that alternative composition strategies, such as having many small animals, may also be effective. The evidence-base presented here can be used to help guide collection planning processes and increase the in situ contributions from zoos, helping to reduce global biodiversity loss. Zoos contribute to conservation actions in the wild. Here, Mooney et al. use a global dataset to show that, while zoos with more and larger animals attract the most visitors and contribute the most to conservation projects, there are viable alternative strategies to maximise attendance and conservation activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available