4.6 Article

Lose-of-Function of a Rice Nucleolus-Localized Pentatricopeptide Repeat Protein Is Responsible for the floury endosperm14 Mutant Phenotypes

Journal

RICE
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1186/s12284-019-0359-x

Keywords

Rice (Oryza sativa); flo14 mutant; OsNPPR3; PPR protein; Nucleolus-targeted

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0100401]
  2. Ministry of Agriculture of China [2016ZX08001006]
  3. Jiangsu Science and Technology Development Program [BE2017368]
  4. Key project for Jiangsu Agricultural New Variety Innovation [PZCZ201701]
  5. NSFC [31571629]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [KYTZ201601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The endosperm of rice (Oryza sativa) has been usually used for the study of starch synthesis. Although several related factors have been revealed, other unknown members remain to be identified, given that starch synthesis is a complicated and sophisticated process. Results Here, we identified and characterized a new rice seed mutant, floury endosperm14 (flo14), which showed chalked endosperm and seed-lethal phenotypes. Map-based cloning indicated FLO14 encodes a novel P-family PPR protein which contains ten PPR motifs. Afterwards the gene was named OsNPPR3. Subcellular localization showed OsNPPR3 was targeted to nucleolus. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that OsNPPR3 was universally expressed in various tissues, with pronounced levels during rice endosperm development. Molecular analysis further suggested that OsNPPR3 was involved in the regulation of expression levels and splicing of a few genes in mitochondria. Conclusion The study demonstrates that the nucleolus-localized PPR protein is responsible for the flo14 mutant phenotypes through affecting nuclear and mitochondrial gene expression and splicing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available