4.6 Article

Planning and Public Health professionals' experiences of using the planning system to regulate hot food takeaway outlets in England: A qualitative study

Journal

HEALTH & PLACE
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102305

Keywords

Takeaway food outlets; Fast food; Urban planning; Obesity; Qualitative methods; England

Funding

  1. NIHR School for Public Health Research
  2. University of Sheffield
  3. University of Bristol
  4. University of Cambridge
  5. University of Imperial
  6. University College London
  7. London School for Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)
  8. University of Liverpool
  9. University of Lancaster
  10. Fuse - The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health
  11. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Public Health Research (SPHR) [PD-SPH-2015]
  12. Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), a UK Clinical Research Collaboration (UKCRC) Public Health Research Centre of Excellence
  13. British Heart Foundation
  14. Cancer Research UK
  15. Economic and Social Research Council
  16. Medical Research Council
  17. National Institute for Health Research [ES/G007462/1]
  18. Wellcome Trust under UK Clinical Research Collaboration [087636/Z/08/Z]
  19. ESRC [ES/G007462/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  20. MRC [MC_UU_00006/7, MR/K023187/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that adopting planning policies to regulate takeaway food outlets is appropriate for improving health, with internal cooperation and precedent playing key roles in promoting adoption.
Takeaway food outlets offer limited seating and sell hot food to be consumed away from their premises. They typically serve energy-dense, nutrient-poor food. National planning guidelines in England offer the potential for local planning policies to promote healthier food environments through regulation of takeaway food outlets. Around half of English local government areas use this approach, but little is known about the process of adoption. We aimed to explore experiences and perceived success of planning policy adoption. In 2018 we recruited Planning and Public Health professionals from 16 local government areas in England and completed 26 telephone interviews. We analysed data with a thematic analysis approach. Participants felt that planning policy adoption was appropriate and can successfully regulate takeaway food outlets with the intention to improve health. They identified several facilitators and barriers towards adoption. Facilitators included internal cooperation between Planning and Public Health departments, and precedent for planning policy adoption set elsewhere. Barriers included nanny-state criticism, and difficulty demonstrating planning policy effectiveness. These could be considered in future guidelines to support widespread planning policy adoption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available