4.1 Article

Role of pelvic radiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous unresectable distant metastases

Journal

CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 805-810

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.06.009

Keywords

Rectal cancer; Metastatic; Unresectable; Pelvic radiotherapy; Chemoradiotherapy; Curative resection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. - To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pelvic irradiation combined systematic chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced (cT3-T4 and/or cN+) rectal cancer and synchronous unresectable distant metastases. Patients and methods. - A total of 76 eligible patients who received pelvic radiotherapy and concurrent capecitabine-based chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and a multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors. Results. - Most of the adverse events were mild during the period of combined chemoradiotherapy. Twenty-two patients experienced resection of primary tumour and 16 patients underwent radical surgery of all lesions. Only five patients had pelvic progression during the follow-up period. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 13 and 30 months, respectively. Radical surgery of all lesions following chemoradiotherapy was found to be an independent prognostic factor according to multivariate analysis. Conclusions. - Pelvic irradiation combined with systematic chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous unresectable distant metastases is effective and tolerable, both for pelvic and distant control. A curative resection following chemoradiotherapy was associated with prolonged survival. (C) 2016 Societe frangaise de radiotherapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available