4.6 Review

Challenge for the detection of microplastics in the environment

Journal

WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 5-15

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wer.1281

Keywords

analytical method; contaminant; microplastics; qualitative analysis; quantitative analysis

Funding

  1. Guangdong Yangfan Program [201635018] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Zhanjiang City [2018A02014] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Guangdong MEPP Fund [GDOE2019A52] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhanjiang) [ZJW-2019-07, ZJW-2019-08] Funding Source: Medline
  5. Industrial Development Special Funds of Dapeng New Area [KY20180202] Funding Source: Medline
  6. Guangdong Special Support Program [2017TQ04N706] Funding Source: Medline
  7. Science and Technology Planning Project of Shenzhen City [JCYJ20170818111719650] Funding Source: Medline
  8. Innovation and Development Project about Marine Economy Demonstration of Zhanjiang City [2017C8B1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microplastics, as an emerging environmental contaminant, have gained global attention, and the analytical methods including sample collection, separation, identification, and quantification need to be standardized; Digestion can facilitate the identification by removing organic matter; Combining microscope with analytical instruments can enhance the identification of microplastics.
As an emerging contaminant in the environment, microplastics have attracted worldwide attention. Although research methods on microplastics in the environment have been reported extensively, the data on microplastics obtained cannot be comparable due to different methods. In this work, we critically reviewed the analytical methods of microplastics, including sample collection, separation, identification, and quantification. Manta trawl and tweezers or cassette corers are used to collect water samples and sediments, respectively. For biota sample, internal organs need to be dissected and separated to obtain microplastics. Density differences are often used to separate microplastics from the sample matrix. Visual classification is one of the most common methods for identifying microplastics, and it can be better detected by combining it with other instruments. However, they are not suitable for detection nanoplastics, which may lead to underestimation of risk. The abundance of microplastics varies with the detection method. Thus, the analytical methods for microplastics need to be standardized as soon as possible. Meanwhile, new methods for analyzing nanoplastics are urgently needed. Practitioner points Sampling, separation, identification, and quantification are important procedures. The sampling and separation methods for microplastics need to be standardized. The organic matter can be removed by digestion to facilitate identification. Combine microscope with analytical instruments to better identify microplastics. There is still a challenge to quantification of smaller-sized plastic particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available