4.2 Article

Whole-genome sequencing and comparative transcriptome analysis of Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrovirus La strain

Journal

VIRUS GENES
Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages 249-259

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11262-019-01727-2

Keywords

Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrovirus; BmNPV; Baculovirus; Whole-genome sequencing; Transcriptome analysis

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H02966, 19J13817, 25292196, 16H05051] Funding Source: KAKEN
  2. Japan Science and Technology Agency [AS262Z01406N] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19H02966, 19J13817, 221S0002, 16H05051, 25292196] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Utsunomiya University [Venture Business Laboratory Program F, Young Innovation Scholarship] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrovirus (BmNPV) La is a variant BmNPV strain isolated in Laos. La has different features from BmNPV type strain T3 in virulence, production of the polyhedrin protein, and the formation of multicapsid occlusion-derived viruses. Here, the whole-genome sequence of La was compared to the sequences of nine BmNPV and two Bombyx mandarina nucleopolyhedrovirus strains. The complete La genome consisted of 127,618 base pairs with a G + C content of 40.3% and contained putative 136 open reading frames encoding more than 60 amino acids. The La genome lacked the bro-b gene and had the highest identity with that of the T3 strain. A comparison of the transcriptomes of La- and T3-infected cells showed that the expression levels of the polyhedrin and cathepsin genes were greater in cells infected with La as compared to those infected with T3. Interestingly, the virus genes with different RNA levels between the two BmNPV strains were assembled into five clusters in the genome of La. Also, the RNA levels of host ribosomal protein genes were significantly decreased in cells infected with La as compared to those infected with T3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available