4.6 Article

Fabrication of vascularized and scaffold-free bone tissue using endothelial and osteogenic cells differentiated from bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells

Journal

TISSUE & CELL
Volume 61, Issue -, Pages 21-29

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2019.08.003

Keywords

Bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cell; Tissue engineering; Cell sheet; pre-vascularization; Rat skull critical defect

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81670969]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu province [17JR5RA202]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzubjky-2017-it46]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over-dependence on existing synthetic scaffolds and insufficient vascularization limit the development of tissue engineered bone (TEB). The purpose of this study is to fabricate vascularized and scaffold-free bone tissue using cell sheet technology and to assess its feasibility to repair critical-sized calvarial defects in rats. Firstly, the pre-vascularized cell sheet was formed by seeding BMSC-derived endothelial cells (ECs) on an undifferentiated BMSCs cell sheet layer in vitro. After 3 days of co-culture, ECs migrated and rearranged to form lumens on the BMSC sheet. Secondly, osteogenic cell sheet was formed by inducing osteogenic differentiation of high density BMSCs. Then, the pre-vascularized cell sheet was stacked on BMSC-derived osteogenic cell sheet to fabricate a scaffold-free construct for bone regeneration. Finally, the scaffold-free construct with both angiogenic and osteogenic potential was implanted into critical-sized calvarial defects in adult Wistar rats. Results showed that more functional perfused blood vessels and new bone tissue formed in the pre-vascularized group than that in the controls (both empty and non-pre-vascularized cell sheet group). This study indicates a new promising strategy for bone tissue regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available