4.6 Article

Oocyte and embryo evaluation by AI and multi-spectral auto-fluorescence imaging: Livestock embryology needs to catch-up to clinical practice

Journal

THERIOGENOLOGY
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages 255-262

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.061

Keywords

Embryo selection; Machine learning; Pregnancy establishment; Embryo metabolism; Morphokinetics

Funding

  1. Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics (CNBP), through the Australian Research Council (ARC) [CE140100003]
  2. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP)
  3. National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1077694]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A highly accurate 'non-invasive quantitative embryo assessment for pregnancy' (NQEAP) technique that determines embryo quality has been an elusive goal. If developed, NQEAP would transform the selection of embryos from both Multiple Ovulation and Embryo Transfer (MOET), and even more so, in vitro produced (IVP) embryos for livestock breeding. The area where this concept is already having impact is in the field of clinical embryology, where great strides have been taken in the application of morphokinetics and artificial intelligence (AI); while both are already in practice, rigorous and robust evidence of efficacy is still required. Even the translation of advances in the qualitative scoring of human IVF embryos have yet to be translated to the livestock IVP industry, which remains dependent on the MOET-standardised 3-point scoring system. Furthermore, there are new ways to interrogate the biochemistry of individual embryonic cells by using new, light-based methodologies, such as FLIM and hyperspectral microscopy. Combinations of these technologies, in particular combining new imaging systems with AI, will lead to very accurate NQEAP predictive tools, improving embryo selection and recipient pregnancy success. Crown Copyright (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available