4.7 Article

Sensing strategy based on Carbon Quantum Dots obtained from riboflavin for the identification of pesticides

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 301, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.127149

Keywords

Carbon Quantum Dots; Riboflavin; Silver nanoparticles; Fluorescence; Pesticides; Sensor

Funding

  1. CAPES [001]
  2. CNPq [408790/2016-4]
  3. Funcap [PNE-0112-00048.01.00/16]
  4. Fondecyt [3170240]
  5. Basal Program for Centers of Excellence, CONICYT [FB0807 CEDENNA]
  6. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa em Energia e Materiais (CNPEM) [XPS -23792]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a fluorescent sensing strategy was developed for identification of pesticides in food, which was obtained thought the interaction of carbon quantum dots (CQDs) and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs). The CQDs were synthesized from riboflavin according to an experimental design. On this basis, the most appropriate samples were selected and structurally characterized, where AgNPs efficiently quench the fluorescence of CQDs due a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). The CQDs was titrationed with AgNPs (Ag@PAA and Ag@ bPEI), determining the best concentration of quenching (0.228 and 3.030 pmol.L-1, respectively). Furthermore, a strategy of sensing was developed in order to identify the pesticides propanyl, parathion, dimethoate, chlorpyrifos and pyrimicarb, which were also verified in real samples of rice, carrot, orange and pepper. The results were analyzed by linear discriminant analysis (LDA), obtaining different response patterns against pesticide concentrations, with confidence level of 95%. After that, assays were performed using lower concentrations of the analyzes. It was verified that in pepper extract, the sensibility of the sensing strategy was 250 ng.mL(-1). Therefore, the CQDs synthesized in this work may be considered a powerful tool to identify pesticides in food samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available