Accuracy of CAD/CAM Digital Impressions with Different Intraoral Scanner Parameters
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Accuracy of CAD/CAM Digital Impressions with Different Intraoral Scanner Parameters
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
SENSORS
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 1157
Publisher
MDPI AG
Online
2020-02-21
DOI
10.3390/s20041157
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro
- (2019) Moritz Zimmermann et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
- Impact of Different Scan Bodies and Scan Strategies on the Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Assessed with an Intraoral Scanner: An In Vitro Study
- (2019) Constantin Motel et al. Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry
- Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method
- (2018) R. Nedelcu et al. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
- A novel in vivo method to evaluate trueness of digital impressions
- (2018) Emad A. Albdour et al. BMC Oral Health
- Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions
- (2018) Priscilla Medina-Sotomayor et al. PLoS One
- Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch
- (2018) Priscilla Medina-Sotomayor et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons
- (2017) Walter Renne et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Analysis on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: The Effects of Mandibular Anterior Interdental Space
- (2017) Ji-hye Chun et al. Applied Sciences-Basel
- In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions
- (2016) Andreas Ender et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
- Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review
- (2016) Pekka Ahlholm et al. Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry
- Trueness and Precision of Four Intraoral Scanners in Oral Implantology: A Comparative in Vitro Study
- (2016) Francesco G. Mangano et al. PLoS One
- Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients
- (2015) Moritz Boeddinghaus et al. Clinical Oral Investigations
- Microgaps and Demineralization Progress around Composite Restorations
- (2015) A. Turkistani et al. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH
- Evaluation of the Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Using Two Different Chairside CAD/CAM Systems on Preparations of Varying Quality
- (2015) Walter Renne et al. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
- Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes
- (2014) Emir Yuzbasioglu et al. BMC Oral Health
- Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: Virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness
- (2009) Anna S.K. Persson et al. DENTAL MATERIALS
- A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience
- (2009) Takashi MIYAZAKI et al. DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL
- Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses
- (2009) Wael Att et al. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started