4.7 Article

Environmental sciences benefit from robust evidence irrespective of speed

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 696, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134000

Keywords

Conservation; Policy; Open science; Reproducibility; Slow science movement

Funding

  1. Environment and Climate Change Canada [GCXE19S058]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

y Discussions around the slow science movement abound in environmental sciences, yet they are generally counterproductive. Researchers must focus on producing robust and transparent knowledge, regardless of speed. Slow versus fast science is irrelevant - what we need is reproducible research to support evidence-based decision making and tackle urgent and costly environmental problems. Crown Copyright (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available