4.7 Article

National Sociodemographic Disparities in the Treatment of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Do Academic Cancer Centers Perform Better Than Community Cancer Centers?

Journal

CANCER
Volume 122, Issue 21, Pages 3371-3377

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30205

Keywords

academic center; community center; disparities; National Cancer Data Base; patterns of care; prostatic neoplasm

Categories

Funding

  1. Prostate Cancer Foundation
  2. Fitz's Cancer Warriors
  3. Anonymous family foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Most major cancer organizations seek to reduce sociodemographic disparities in high-risk cancers partly by increasing access to theoretically high-quality, academic-oriented cancer care. The objective of this study was to determine whether academic centers have less sociodemographic treatment disparities than community centers using high-risk prostate cancer as a test case. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify 138,019 patients who were diagnosed with nonmetastatic, high-risk prostate cancer from 2004 to 2012. Multivariable logistic analysis was used to identify independent determinants of definitive therapy. The Gray test and multivariable Cox regression were used to analyze the timing of therapy. All analyses were stratified by academic versus community cancer center. RESULTS: Compared with white or privately insured patients, black, Hispanic, and uninsured patients with prostate cancer were less likely to receive definitive therapy at both community centers (adjusted odds ratio: 0.60 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.56-0.64], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.61-0.78], and 0.25 [95% CI, 0.22-0.30], respectively) and academic cancer centers (adjusted odds ratio: 0.50 [95% CI, 0.46-0.54], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.50-0.64], and 0.31 [95% CI, 0.28-0.36], respectively). Among patients who received definitive therapy, black, Hispanic, and uninsured patients were more likely to experience treatment delays at both community centers (>= 15, >= 10, and >= 19 days, respectively; all Gray P<.001) and academic centers (>= 19, >= 11, and >= 18 days, respectively); treatment delays were observed among the aforementioned groups even after multivariable Cox regression analysis (P<.001 for all adjusted hazard ratios). CONCLUSIONS: Nationally, academic cancer centers demonstrate similarly high rates of sociodemographic disparities in cancer treatment patterns as community cancer centers. Making community centers conform to academic center standards may not necessarily reduce treatment disparities. (C) 2016 American Cancer Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available