4.6 Article

Distinctive tasks of different cyanobacteria and associated bacteria in carbon as well as nitrogen fixation and cycling in a late stage Baltic Sea bloom

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223294

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Human Frontiers Science Program [RGP0020/2016]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [03F0626A]
  3. Leibniz Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cyanobacteria and associated heterotrophic bacteria hold key roles in carbon as well as nitrogen fixation and cycling in the Baltic Sea due to massive cyanobacterial blooms each summer. The species specific activities of different cyanobacterial species as well as the Nand C-exchange of associated heterotrophic bacteria in these processes, however, are widely unknown. Within one time series experiment we tested the cycling in a natural, late stage cyanobacterial bloom by adding C-13 bi-carbonate and N-15(2), and performed sampling after 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, 6 h and 24 h in order to determine the fixing species as well as the fate of the fixed carbon and nitrogen in the associations. Uptake of N-15 and C-13 isotopes by the most abundant cyanobacterial species as well as the most abundant associated heterotrophic bacterial groups was then analysed by NanoSIMS. Overall, the filamentous, heterocystous species Dolichospermum sp., Nodularia sp., and Aphanizomenon sp. revealed no or erratic uptake of carbon and nitrogen, indicating mostly inactive cells. In contrary, nonheterocystous Pseudanabaena sp. dominated the nitrogen and carbon fixation, with uptake rates up to 1.49 +/- 0.47 nmol N h(-1) l(-1) and 2.55 +/- 0.91 nmol C h(-1) l(-1). Associated heterotrophic bacteria dominated the subsequent nitrogen remineralization with uptake rates up to 1.2 +/- 1.93 fmol N h(-1) cell(-1), but were also indicative for fixation of di-nitrogen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available