4.2 Article

Newly discovered coralline algae in Southeast Brazil: Tectolithon fluminense gen. et sp. nov. and Crustaphytum atlanticum sp. nov. (Hapalidiales, Rhodophyta)

Journal

PHYCOLOGIA
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages 101-115

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00318884.2019.1702320

Keywords

Corallinophycidae; Melobesioideae; Morpho-anatomy; Non-geniculate coralline algae; psbA; rbcL; Taxonomy

Funding

  1. Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Research Support in Rio de Janeiro

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two new Melobesioideae, Tectolithon fluminense gen. et sp. nov. and Crustaphytum atlanticum sp. nov., were described based on specimens collected at depths from 2 to 30 m in a tropical to subtropical transitional region of Southeast Brazil. Analyses of the plastid-encoded markers psbA and rbcL demonstrated that these taxonomic novelties belong to the clade formed by the typically subarctic/arctic Clathromorphum complex. Tectolithon fluminense has tetra/bisporangial and carposporangial conceptacles that typically become buried in the thallus because of an enveloping process caused by the development of a vegetative rim that grows from the margins of the conceptacle. The rim then fuses and creates a vegetative cover. The development of this vegetative cover is described in detail and its possible convergent evolution in other taxa is discussed. Crustaphytum atlanticum differed morpho-anatomically from the generitype, C. pacificum (the only other known species in this genus), by thallus thickness, maximum number of epithallial cell layers, relative size of subepithallial initials and tetra/bisporangial conceptacle chamber dimensions. The observation of specimens from Tectolithon and Crustaphytum with subepithallial initials that are both longer and shorter than their immediate inward derivatives indicates that this morpho-anatomical character should be used with caution for generic delimitation in the Melobesioideae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available