4.3 Article

Dorsoventral variation in photosynthesis during leaf senescence probed by chlorophyll a fluorescence induction kinetics in cucumber and maize plants

Journal

PHOTOSYNTHETICA
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages 479-487

Publisher

ACAD SCIENCES CZECH REPUBLIC, INST EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
DOI: 10.32615/ps.2020.005

Keywords

dorsiventral leaf; isobilateral leaf; light gradient; microstructure; photosystem II

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31571576, 31970350]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although photosynthesis has been intensively studied during leaf senescence, it is unclear whether the changes of photosynthetic function in various mesophyll tissues can be detected using chlorophyll a fluorescence induction kinetics (CFI) in vivo. To clarify this question, leaf structure and CFI were carefully examined in senescent leaves. The results showed declines in chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate in both cucumber and maize plants as leaves aged. In cucumber leaves, the number of chloroplasts decreased more rapidly in the palisade tissue compared to the sponge tissue as senescence progressed. Under various pulse light intensities, the enhancement of the relative variable fluorescence in the CFI curves measured on the adaxial side was larger than that on the abaxial side of senescent cucumber leaves, indicating senescence in the palisade tissue progressed more quickly than that in the sponge tissue. JIP-test parameters further showed that the loss of photosynthetic electron transport activity in palisade tissue was faster than that in sponge tissue. However, during leaf senescence in maize, there were no such dorsoventral differences. We therefore propose that the decline of photosynthesis in cucumber leaves is largely determined by the senescence of palisade tissue. The changes in photosynthesis in palisade and sponge tissues with leaf aging can be probed effectively by CFI measured on both sides of cucumber leaves in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available