4.4 Article

Brand recall of skippable vs non-skippable ads in YouTube Readapting information and arousal to active audiences

Journal

ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 545-562

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/OIR-01-2019-0035

Keywords

YouTube; Audiences; Ad format

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose By integrating the evidence of various audience theories, a comparison is made of viewers' information processing of new interactive video advertising formats (skippable video ads) with traditional, non-skippable formats. The purpose of this paper is to focus on how exposure to a brand name at different moments during online video advertisements influences viewers' recall. Design/methodology/approach A neuroscientific pre-test supported the selection of an arousing video, and a subsequent pre-test confirmed the scenario validity. Using a broader sample, the main study applied a 3x2 experimental design of different ad designs and formats. Findings Distinctions should be made between formats and audiences that lead to different information processing methods. Users exposed to skippable ads (active audiences) exert a higher control over advertising and tend to process the information presented in the initial part of an ad. In turn, users viewing non-skippable ads (passive audiences) should be exposed to the high arousal stimulus before presentation of the key information that the advertiser wants them to remember. Originality/value Skippable online videos have become a commonly used advertising format, but research into their effects is scarce. This study offers the first comparison of viewers' reactions towards skippable vs non-skippable formats, in terms of brand recall and economic performance. Further research might extend this underdeveloped field of study and enhance the knowledge of video format processing in social media.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available