4.3 Article

Comparison of Modified Posterior Sub-Tenon's vs. Trans-Septal Triamcinolone Injection for Non-infectious Uveitis

Journal

OCULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND INFLAMMATION
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 857-864

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1698748

Keywords

Periocular steroid injection; steroid intraocular pressure response; uveitic cystoid macular edema; uveitis; vitritis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the safety and efficacy of trans-septal vs. modified posterior sub-Tenon's corticosteroid injections for noninfectious uveitis and found no significant difference in visual acuity improvement and cataract surgery rates between the groups, but a higher rate of vitritis resolution in the modified PST group. Furthermore, the modified PST injection could result in a higher intraocular pressure elevation rate, which could be managed by corticosteroid removal.
Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of trans-septal vs. modified posterior sub-Tenon's (PST) corticosteroid injections for noninfectious uveitis. Methods: Retrospective comparison of periocular triamcinolone injection by modified PST (n = 36) vs. traditional trans-septal (n = 79) techniques. Safety and efficacy outcomes were analyzed with regression models. Results: There was no significant difference in visual acuity improvement between the groups at 6 months. There were higher rates of vitritis resolution in the modified PST group but this was not statistically significant (85.7% vs 62.9%, p = .07). Intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation rate trended higher with the modified PST injection (21.9% vs 9.0%, p = .06), with no instances of glaucoma surgery in either group. Two modified PST injection patients with refractory IOP rises had IOP normalization after corticosteroid depot removal. One year cataract surgery rates were similar. Conclusion: Modified PST injection offers clinical efficacy but with possibly higher IOP response rate which could be managed with corticosteroid removal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available