4.4 Article

FLOCCULATION WITH LYSOZYME: A NON-ENZYMATIC APPLICATION

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages 231-237

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.22386

Keywords

flocculation; biopolymer; protein; enzymes; cationic

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Ontario Government
  3. AbitibiBowater
  4. Alstom Power
  5. Andritz
  6. Aracruz Celulose
  7. Babcock Wilcox
  8. Boise Paper
  9. Celulose Nipo-Brasileira
  10. Carter Holt Harvey
  11. Clyde-Bergemann
  12. Diamond Power International
  13. Domtar
  14. DMI Peace River Pulp Division
  15. Georgia Pacific
  16. International Paper
  17. Irving Pulp Paper
  18. Metso Power
  19. MeadWestvaco
  20. Stora Enso Research
  21. Tembec
  22. Votorantim Celulose e Papel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioflocculants have been previously recognized as an alternative to synthetic polymers due to their renewable sources and biodegradability. In this study, the flocculating activity of lysozyme on kaolin suspensions was investigated and compared to a known flocculant, a cationic polyacrylamide. Lysozyme was found to significantly aid in the flocculation of kaolin particles. The flocculating activity of lysozyme on kaolin was affected by the pH of the suspensions, while the addition of Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions did not have a significant effect. Potential industrial applications such as the flocculation of powdered activated carbon and algae suspensions were investigated and the addition of lysozyme resulted in significant flocculation. Furthermore, the flocculating properties of lysozyme are independent of its enzymatic activity. Our results indicate that lysozyme acts as a low molecular mass cationic polymer, where the main mechanism for flocculation on negatively-charged particles is charge neutralization. Other cationic proteins could potentially be used as bioflocculants to enhance solid-liquid separation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available