Journal
CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 518-525Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0963180116000268
Keywords
nanotechnology; public engagement in science; nanotechnology regulation
Funding
- University of Melbourne
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Upstream engagement is commonly regarded as necessary for the smooth implementation of new technologies, particularly when there is an impact on health. Is the healthcare context in Australia geared toward such public engagement? There are established engagement practices for issues of healthcare resourcing, for example; however, the situation becomes more complex with the introduction of a new technology such as nanomedicine.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available