4.0 Editorial Material

Public Engagement and Nanotechnology in Australia

Journal

CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 518-525

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0963180116000268

Keywords

nanotechnology; public engagement in science; nanotechnology regulation

Funding

  1. University of Melbourne

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Upstream engagement is commonly regarded as necessary for the smooth implementation of new technologies, particularly when there is an impact on health. Is the healthcare context in Australia geared toward such public engagement? There are established engagement practices for issues of healthcare resourcing, for example; however, the situation becomes more complex with the introduction of a new technology such as nanomedicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available