- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A new standard for the analysis and design of replication studies
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
Volume 183, Issue 2, Pages 431-448
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2019-12-26
DOI
10.1111/rssa.12493
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The assessment of intrinsic credibility and a new argument for p < 0.005
- (2019) Leonhard Held Royal Society Open Science
- The False Positive Risk: A Proposal Concerning What to Do About p-Values
- (2019) David Colquhoun AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- The Proposal to Lower P Value Thresholds to .005
- (2018) John P. A. Ioannidis JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Beyond ‘significance’: principles and practice of the Analysis of Credibility
- (2018) Robert A. J. Matthews Royal Society Open Science
- Addressing the “Replication Crisis”: Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power
- (2017) Samantha F. Anderson et al. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH
- Adaptive power priors with empirical Bayes for clinical trials
- (2017) Isaac Gravestock et al. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS
- The reproducibility of research and the misinterpretation of p -values
- (2017) David Colquhoun Royal Society Open Science
- Bayesian evaluation of effect size after replicating an original study
- (2017) Robbie C. M. van Aert et al. PLoS One
- On the Reproducibility of Psychological Science
- (2016) Valen E. Johnson et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
- Aligning statistical and scientific reasoning
- (2016) Steven N. Goodman SCIENCE
- Evaluating replicability of laboratory experiments in economics
- (2016) C. F. Camerer et al. SCIENCE
- What does research reproducibility mean?
- (2016) Steven N. Goodman et al. Science Translational Medicine
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- Reverse-Bayes analysis of two common misinterpretations of significance tests
- (2013) Leonhard Held Clinical Trials
- Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
- (2013) Katherine S. Button et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Revised standards for statistical evidence
- (2013) V. E. Johnson PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Null misinterpretation in statistical testing and its impact on health risk assessment
- (2011) Sander Greenland PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started