4.5 Article

Effects of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on aortic stiffness in patients with resistant hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea: A randomized controlled trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12990

Keywords

aortic stiffness; carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity; continuous positive airway pressure; obstructive sleep apnea; randomized controlled trial; resistant hypertension

Funding

  1. Conselho Brasileiro de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq, Distrito Federal, Brazil)
  2. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)
  3. Brazilian Ministry of Health (DECIT, Distrito Federal, Brazil)
  4. Brazilian Ministry of Science and Tecnology (FINEP, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Resistant hypertension (RHT) is associated with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and increased aortic stiffness, measured by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV). We aimed to evaluate in a randomized controlled trial, the effect of Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on cf-PWV in comparison with a control group in patients with RHT and moderate-severe OSA. One-hundred and sixteen patients were randomized to 6-month CPAP treatment (56 patients) or no therapy (60 patients), while keeping their antihypertensive treatment unchanged. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was performed at the beginning and end of the 6-month period. Intention-to-treat intergroup differences in cf-PWV changes were assessed by a generalized mixed-effects model with the allocation group as a fixed factor and adjusted for age, sex, changes in mean arterial pressure and the baseline cf-PWV values. Subgroup sensitivity analyses were performed, excluding patients with low CPAP adherence and low cf-PWV at baseline. CPAP and control groups had similar clinic-laboratorial characteristics. Patients had a mean cf-PWV of 9.4 +/- 1.6 m/s and 33% presented cf-PWV > 10 m/s. During treatment, the control group had a mean increase in cf-PWV of +0.43 m/s (95% confidence interval [CI], +0.14 to +0.73 m/s; p = .005), whereas the CPAP group had a mean increase of +0.03 m/s (95% CI, -0.33 to +0.39 m/s; p = .87), resulting in a mean difference in changes between CPAP and control of -0.40 m/s (95% CI, -0.82 to +0.02 m/s; p = .059). Subgroup analyses did not change the results. In conclusion, a 6-month CPAP treatment did not reduce aortic stiffness, measured by cf-PWV, in patients with RHT and moderate/severe OSA, but treatment may prevent its progression, in contrast to no-CPAP therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available