4.3 Article

A cadaveric study of radial and ulnar bowing in the sagittal and coronal planes

Journal

JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 1010-1018

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.016

Keywords

Bowing; angulation; forearm; osteology; radius; ulna; PUDA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This study provides a comprehensive, full-length assessment of radial and ulnar bowing in anteroposterior (AP) and sagittal planes. Methods: Radial and ulnar AP and lateral bowing were assessed using orthogonal digital photographs of 211 randomly selected cadaveric bilateral forearms (422 radius, 422 ulna bones) from a well-preserved osteologic collection. Results: In the radial AP plane, an apex- radial bow was present at a mean of 58% of bone length (slightly distal to midpoint), with a mean depth of 1.3 cm. In the radial lateral plane, an apex-dorsal bow occurred at a mean of 45% of bone length, with a mean depth of 0.8 cm. In the ulnar AP plane, apex-radial bow occurred at a mean of 32% of bone length with a mean depth of 1.0 cm. In the ulnar lateral plane, the majority of specimens (81%) had an apex-dorsal bow, whereas 19% had a reverse (apex-volar) bow. Lateral ulnar bow was located at a mean of 33% of bone length with a mean depth of 2.0 cm, with 36% of specimens possessing a lateral bow located at 35% or more distal along the ulna. Side-to-side differences for bow location and depth were less than 2% of bone length. Conclusions: Ulnar lateral bow was found to be more distal than in previously published works, which analyzed only the proximal ulna, and this study describes a reverse ulnar bow in 19% of specimens. This demonstrates lateral ulnar morphology to be more variable than previously defined with minimal side-to-side variability, which are important considerations for fracture fixation and elbow arthroplasty. (C) 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available