4.2 Article

Decline number of uterine fundal pressure maneuver in Japan recent 5 years

Journal

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 413-417

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jog.14203

Keywords

cerebral palsy; cesarean section; fetal heart rate tracing; non-reassuring fetal status; uterine rupture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To clarify whether the incidence of uterine fundal pressure (UFP) maneuver at delivery and consequent uterine rupture were declined. Methods Population-based postal questionnaire study was conducted. A questionnaire was sent to obstetric institutions across Japan. Questions were included the total number of deliveries, UFP and uterine ruptures associated with UFP in 2012 and 2017. As the primary outcome, frequencies of the UFP and uterine rupture were compared between 2012 and 2017. The secondary outcomes were included improved managements of delivery regarding UFP. Results A number of vaginal deliveries were significantly declined from 80.4% in 2012 to 78.1% in 2017 (P < 0.001). Frequencies of UFP per vaginal deliveries were also significantly declined 11.2% (38 973/347771) in 2012 to 9.5% (35 205/404444) in 2017 (<0.001). Number of uterine ruptures were 6 cases in 2012 (1:6496) and 11 cases in 2017 (1:3473) (P = 0.210). Compared to situation in 2012, informed consent was more frequently obtained for UFP in 2017. Written informed consent for UFP became to be obtained in 12% of institutions in 2017 from only 3% in 2012. More than 80% of institutions are performing UFP within 3 times. Regarding to uterine rupture, try of labor after the cesarean section, UFP and augmentation were improved in more than 10% of institutions. Most impact vehicle changing behavior was OBGY clinical guideline. Conclusion Although significant declined incidence of uterine rupture after UFP could not be demonstrated, frequency of UFP was decreased recent 5 years. This is due to improvement of obstetric management by obstetric caregivers throughout Japan.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available