4.6 Article

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) passage through nucleosomes depends on Pol I subunits binding its lobe structure

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 295, Issue 15, Pages 4782-4795

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.011827

Keywords

nucleolus; RNA polymerase II; RNA polymerase I; ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) (ribosomal RNA); transcription; transcription elongation factor; RNA polymerase III; nucleosome; ribosome; chromatin; Rpa34; 5; Rpa49

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 960]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is a highly efficient enzyme specialized in synthesizing most ribosomal RNAs. After nucleosome deposition at each round of rDNA replication, the Pol I transcription machinery has to deal with nucleosomal barriers. It has been suggested that Pol I?associated factors facilitate chromatin transcription, but it is unknown whether Pol I has an intrinsic capacity to transcribe through nucleosomes. Here, we used in vitro transcription assays to study purified WT and mutant Pol I variants from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and compare their abilities to pass a nucleosomal barrier with those of yeast Pol II and Pol III. Under identical conditions, purified Pol I and Pol III, but not Pol II, could transcribe nucleosomal templates. Pol I mutants lacking either the heterodimeric subunit Rpa34.5/Rpa49 or the C-terminal part of the specific subunit Rpa12.2 showed a lower processivity on naked DNA templates, which was even more reduced in the presence of a nucleosome. Our findings suggest that the lobe-binding subunits Rpa34.5/Rpa49 and Rpa12.2 facilitate passage through nucleosomes, suggesting possible cooperation among these subunits. We discuss the contribution of Pol I?specific subunit domains to efficient Pol I passage through nucleosomes in the context of transcription rate and processivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available