What are the most crucial soil variables for predicting the distribution of mountain plant species? A comprehensive study in the Swiss Alps
Published 2020 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
What are the most crucial soil variables for predicting the distribution of mountain plant species? A comprehensive study in the Swiss Alps
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2020-01-27
DOI
10.1111/jbi.13803
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments
- (2019) Miguel B. Araújo et al. Science Advances
- Ecological indicator values reveal missing predictors of species distributions
- (2019) Daniel Scherrer et al. Scientific Reports
- Spatial modelling of soil water holding capacity improves models of plant distributions in mountain landscapes
- (2019) C. Cianfrani et al. PLANT AND SOIL
- Effects of simulated observation errors on the performance of species distribution models
- (2018) Rui F. Fernandes et al. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS
- Paintings predict the distribution of species, or the challenge of selecting environmental predictors and evaluation statistics
- (2017) Yoan Fourcade et al. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Beyond climate control on species range: The importance of soil data to predict distribution of Amazonian plant species
- (2017) Fernando O. G. Figueiredo et al. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Soil factors improve predictions of plant species distribution in a mountain environment
- (2017) Aline Buri et al. PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY
- Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being
- (2017) Gretta T. Pecl et al. SCIENCE
- Tree species distribution in temperate forests is more influenced by soil than by climate
- (2017) Lorenz Walthert et al. Ecology and Evolution
- Contemporary Remotely Sensed Data Products Refine Invasive Plants Risk Mapping in Data Poor Regions
- (2017) Tuyet T. A. Truong et al. Frontiers in Plant Science
- Climate, soil or both? Which variables are better predictors of the distributions of Australian shrub species?
- (2017) Yasmin Hageer et al. PeerJ
- Conservation planners tend to ignore improved accuracy of modelled species distributions to focus on multiple threats and ecological processes
- (2016) Ayesha I.T. Tulloch et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- What we use is not what we know: environmental predictors in plant distribution models
- (2016) Heidi K. Mod et al. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE
- Soil aeration, water deficit, nitrogen availability, acidity and temperature all contribute to shaping tree species distribution in temperate forests
- (2016) Christian Piedallu et al. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE
- Snowbeds are more affected than other subalpine-alpine plant communities by climate change in the Swiss Alps
- (2016) Magalì Matteodo et al. Ecology and Evolution
- The iterative ensemble modelling approach increases the accuracy of fish distribution models
- (2014) Christine Lauzeral et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Beyond a Climate-Centric View of Plant Distribution: Edaphic Variables Add Value to Distribution Models
- (2014) Frieda Beauregard et al. PLoS One
- Bedrock composition regulates mountain ecosystems and landscape evolution
- (2014) W. Jesse Hahm et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Evaluating ensemble forecasts of plant species distributions under climate change
- (2013) Shawn M. Crimmins et al. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
- Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions
- (2013) Antoine Guisan et al. ECOLOGY LETTERS
- How does selection of climate variables affect predictions of species distributions? A case study of three new weeds in New Zealand
- (2013) C S Sheppard WEED RESEARCH
- Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance
- (2012) Carsten F. Dormann et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Disregarding the edaphic dimension in species distribution models leads to the omission of crucial spatial information under climate change: the case ofQuercus pubescensin France
- (2012) Romain Bertrand et al. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
- Soil water balance performs better than climatic water variables in tree species distribution modelling
- (2012) Christian Piedallu et al. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Improving the prediction of plant species distribution and community composition by adding edaphic to topo-climatic variables
- (2012) Anne Dubuis et al. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE
- Effects of Forest Harvest on Soil Carbon and Related Variables in Canadian Spodosols
- (2012) Stephanie Grand et al. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
- Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: variable selection and scale
- (2010) Mike P. Austin et al. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
- Differences in spatial predictions among species distribution modeling methods vary with species traits and environmental predictors
- (2009) Alexandra D. Syphard et al. ECOGRAPHY
- Climate change and plant distribution: local models predict high-elevation persistence
- (2009) CHRISTOPHE F. RANDIN et al. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
- Use of Community-Composition Data to Predict the Fecundity and Abundance of Species
- (2008) SARAH C. ELMENDORF et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationPublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More