4.6 Article

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation 5-Year Follow-Up of the IVUS-XPL Randomized Trial

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 62-71

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.09.033

Keywords

coronary artery disease; drug-eluting stent; intravascular ultrasound

Funding

  1. Korea Health Technology Research & Development Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute - Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI17C0882, HI16C2211, HI15C2782]
  2. Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation - Korean government [2015M3A9C6031514]
  3. Cardiovascular Research Center, Seoul, Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate whether the beneficial effect of use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is sustained for long-term follow-up. BACKGROUND The use of IVUS promoted favorable 1-year clinical outcome in the IVUS-XPL (Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on the Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions) trial. It is not known, however, whether this effect is sustained for long-term follow-up. METHODS The IVUS-XPL trial randomized 1,400 patients with long coronary lesions (implanted stent length >= 28 mm) to receive IVUS-guided (n = 700) or angiography-guided (n = 700) everolimus-eluting stent implantation. Five-year clinical outcomes were investigated in patients who completed the original trial. The primary outcome was the composite of major adverse cardiac events, including cardiac death, target lesion-related myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization at 5 years, analyzed by intention-to-treat. RESULTS Five-year follow-up was completed in 1,183 patients (85%). Major adverse cardiac events at 5 years occurred in 36 patients (5.6%) receiving IVUS guidance and in 70 patients (10.7%) receiving angiographic guidance (hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% confidence interval: 0.34 to 0.75; p = 0.001). The difference was driven mainly by a lower risk for target lesion revascularization (31 [4.8%] vs. 55 [8.4%]; hazard ratio: 0.54; 95% confidence interval: 0.33 to 0.89; p = 0.007). By landmark analysis, major adverse cardiac events between 1 and 5 years occurred in 17 patients (2.8%) receiving IVUS guidance and in 31 patients (5.2%) receiving angiographic guidance (hazard ratio: 0.53; 95% confidence interval: 0.29 to 0.95; p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS Compared with angiography-guided stent implantation, IVUS-guided stent implantation resulted in a significantly lower rate of major adverse cardiac events up to 5 years. Sustained 5-year clinical benefits resulted from both within 1 year and from 1 to 5 years post-implantation. (Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on the Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions [IVUS-XPL Study]: Retrospective and Prospective Follow-Up Study; NCT03866486) (c) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available