4.2 Article

Upregulation of long noncoding RNA Lnc-IRF2-3 and Lnc-ZNF667-AS1 is associated with poor survival in B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY HEMATOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 284-291

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13167

Keywords

chronic lymphocytic Leukemia; leukemia; Lnc-IRF2-3; Lnc-ZNF667-AS1; zinc finger proteins

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Lnc-IRF2-3 and Lnc-ZNF667-AS1 were recently studied as a positive biomarker for many tumor cells. However, experimental studies found that they are associated with worse outcomes in B-CLL. Methods A prospective case study was conducted on 135 B-CLL patients that were compared to thirty healthy controls. The patients were followed up for 40 months and quantitative measurements of Lnc-IRF2-3 and Lnc-ZNF667-AS1 were measured and compared between the two groups as well as high-risk and low low-risk B-CLL. Results Lnc-IRF2-3 and Lnc-ZNF667-AS1 had a high specificity (94% and 85%) and sensitivity (85%, 87%), respectively, to differentiate B-CLL from healthy controls. Furthermore, they showed high expression levels in high-risk CLL groups. For survival analysis, there was a negative correlation between overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and both biomarkers. However, it was not evident in multivariate Cox regression analysis; in patients with Lnc-IRF2-3 expression level, >67 had a significant decrease in OS and PFS. However, there is no significant effect for high expression levels of Lnc-ZNF667-AS1 on OS (P = .16) or PFS (P = .48). Conclusion The Lnc-IRF2-3 and Lnc-ZNF667-AS1 are promising prognostic biomarkers in B-CLL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available