4.5 Article

Efficacy of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in preventing anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 269-275

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03482-0

Keywords

Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography; Anastomotic leakage; Laparoscopic colorectal surgery; Rectal cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Some recent studies have suggested that fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green (ICG) might be useful for preventing anastomotic leakage (AL) after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. However, its efficacy has not been proven. We evaluated whether intraoperative ICG fluorescence angiography could decrease the AL rate with laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery. Methods This retrospective study included patients with colorectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgery at our institution between March 2014 and December 2018. Patients were divided into two groups: with or without ICG fluorescence angiography. The primary outcome was the rate of AL. Results A total of 488 patients were included: 223 patients in the ICG group and 265 patients in the no-ICG group. In the ICG group, the transection line was changed to a more proximal location in seven patients (3.1%), including one patient with transverse colon surgery and six with rectal surgery. None of these seven patients developed AL. There were 18 ALs (3.7%) overall. The AL rate was 1.8% in the ICG group and 5.3% in the no-ICG group. For colon cancer, there were no significant differences in the AL rate between the groups (p = 0.278). In rectal cancer, the AL rate was significantly lower in the ICG group than in the no-ICG group (3.5% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.041). After propensity score matching, the AL rate was also significantly lower in the ICG group for rectal cancer (p = 0.044). Conclusion ICG fluorescence angiography can potentially reduce the AL rate with laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available