4.4 Article

Electricity-gas-integrated energy planning based on reward and penalty ladder-type carbon trading cost

Journal

IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION
Volume 13, Issue 23, Pages 5263-5270

Publisher

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.0666

Keywords

environmental economics; thermal power stations; investment; power generation economics; power generation planning; optimisation; pricing; energy conservation; costing; power system planning; air pollution control; electricity-gas-integrated energy; penalty ladder-type carbon trading cost; energy Internet; low-carbon electricity; energy conservation; emission reduction; electric-gas-integrated energy system planning model; punishment ladder-type carbon trading cost model; carbon emission; investment cost; operation cost; low carbon; carbon trading price

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61873225]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given the background of energy Internet and low-carbon electricity, the integrated energy system has become an important carrier of energy conservation and emission reduction. This study establishes an electric-gas-integrated energy system planning model that considers carbon trading. First, carbon trading is introduced into the planning model. A reward and punishment ladder-type carbon trading cost model is proposed, and its restriction on carbon emission is analysed. On this basis, a planning model is established, to minimise the total costs including the investment cost, operation cost, and carbon trading cost. Finally, the discrete bacterial colony chemotaxis algorithm is applied to solve this model. The simulation results of the three planning models are compared and analysed by simulation examples, which verify the effectiveness of the proposed model in balancing the low carbon and economic efficiency of the system. The impact of carbon trading price on system planning and operation is analysed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available