4.7 Article

Effective Capture of Nongraspable Objects for Space Robots Using Geometric Cage Pairs

Journal

IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 95-107

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2019.2952552

Keywords

Robots; Grippers; Regulators; Aerospace electronics; Valves; Propellers; Indexes; Caging-pair method; caging compatibility index; nongraspable objects; space robot simulator

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1304600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775541]
  3. CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team [JCTD-2018-11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Capture and removal of space debris are challenging in robotic on-orbit servicing activities. A large portion of space debris does not possess any graspable features, which makes the conventional grippers inapplicable. To handle such nongraspable objects, a space robotic capture system is presented. A dual-arm space robot simulator that has the advantages of miniaturization and scalability is designed for ground tests. Inspired by the robotic caging, we propose a novel capture method that uses a series of hollow-shaped end-effector pairs to cage the antipodal pairs of the nongraspable objects. To apply the caging-pair method steadily, space robots need exerting a squeezing action on objects, which can be characterized by the motion and force manipulation of two robotic arms in the assigned directions. Based on the velocity and force manipulability transmission ratios, a caging compatibility index is proposed to describe the capturing ability in this manner. Via the optimization of the desired caging compatibility index, an effective algorithm is proposed to plan the near-optimal joint configurations for the pregrasping cages. Finally, both simulation studies and experimental tests are conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed capture method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available