4.4 Editorial Material

Epidemiology of cardiac implantable electronic device infections in the United States: A population-based cohort study

Journal

HEART RHYTHM
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages 1125-1131

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.02.012

Keywords

Administrative data; Cardiac implantable electronic device infections; Health care utilization project; Infection epidemiology; Infection prevention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Trends in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections have been studied previously. However, coding for administrative data is more granular in contemporary data sets and indications for CIED implantation have expanded. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to provide an update on the rates of CIED infection and the influence of different variables including sex, length of stay (LOS), and costs in the United States. METHODS Data from the 2016 Healthcare Care and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database were utilized. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes were used to track CIED infections. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected including Elixhauser comorbidities. The univariate and multivariate logistic and linear regression models were used to assess mortality, costs, and LOS. RESULTS Of 191,610 CIED implantations identified in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database in 2016, 8060 infections (4.2%) were identified. The in-hospital mortality rate for these patients was 4.7%. The majority of patients (68.9%) with CIED infection had >= 3 Elixhauser comorbidities. Women had decreased LOS and costs compared with men, and patients with >= 3 comorbidities had increased costs and LOS. CONCLUSION We identified that the majority of patients with CIED infection had >= 3 comorbidities that were associated with increased costs and LOS. The observed sex differences in health care resource utilization and in-hospital costs among patients admitted with CIED infection requires further exploration. Patients with increased numbers of comorbidities should be recognized and managed carefully peri-CIED implantation given their increased risk of infection and use of health care resources. (c) 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available