4.4 Review

Cellular senescence and senescence-associated Tcells as a potential therapeutic target

Journal

GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 97-100

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ggi.13851

Keywords

biology; senescence; serology; immunology

Funding

  1. Department of Health Development and Medicine Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

More than 50years ago, Hayflick et al. found that no long-lived, proliferative cells remained in long-term cell culture experiments; this phenomenon is called cellular senescence. This finding has allowed us to understand basic individual tissue aging and cancer inhibition from the view of cellular aging. Senescent cells survive and accumulate in the body, and secrete various inflammatory cytokines or chemokines, which is different from the cell fate in apoptosis. These phenomena describe the so-called senescence-associated secretory phenotype, and chronic inflammation and carcinogenesis are induced in the surrounding tissue through senescence-associated secretory phenotype factors. For example, senescence-associated Tcells are an age-dependent CD4((+)) T-cell subpopulation with a PD-1((+)) memory phenotype; these cells do not proliferate in response to T-cell receptor stimulation, and produce abundant osteopontin, as well as inflammatory cytokines. Senescence-associated Tcells are also increased in adipose tissue under a high-fat diet, which might be related to the progress of obesity or diabetes. These series of findings might allow us to connect senescent cells and tissue aging, leading to individual aging. Interestingly, the depletion of senescent cells in the body, called senolysis, successfully increases lifespan and attenuates age-related diseases. This novel therapy is now moving forward to translational research from the bench toward clinical trials. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 97-100.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available