4.6 Article

On the generation and segregation of helicity in geodynamo simulations

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 221, Issue 2, Pages 741-757

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggaa011

Keywords

Dynamo: theories and simulations; Geomagnetic induction; Numerical modelling; Numerical solutions; Statistical methods

Funding

  1. Leverhulme trust, UK [RPG-2015-195/RG77943]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Helicity, the inner product of velocity and vorticity, is considered an important ingredient for the maintenance of a dipolar magnetic field in the geodynamo. Outside the tangent cylinder- an imaginary cylinder which circumscribes the inner core-a spatial segregation of helicity has been observed in several simulations, being negative in the north and positive in the south. Such a segregation pattern is important for a dynamo that relies on the alpha-effect. However, the origin of this pattern in these simulations is poorly understood. In this paper, we use three strongly forced numerical dynamo solutions to study the various sources of helicity, including those due to buoyancy (H-T), Coriolis, Lorentz and viscous forces. We find a strong spatial correlation between the segregation pattern of helicity and H-T both in the instantaneous and the time-averaged results. Our results show that, outside the tangent cylinder, H-T is dominated by the product -u(z)partial derivative T/partial derivative phi, where u(z) is the vertical velocity component and T is the temperature perturbation. It is known that when inertial waves are launched from a localized buoyant anomaly, H-T takes the same sign as the local helicity. We conjecture that this is the reason for the spatial correlation between H-T and helicity in our simulation results. The flow in our simulations being strongly turbulent, this effect seems to be a statistical one and manifests itself most clearly in the averaged quantities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available