4.6 Article

Correlation between a variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphism in SMYD3 gene and breast cancer: A genotype-phenotype study

Journal

GENE
Volume 728, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2019.144281

Keywords

Cancer; Breast; SMYD3; VNTR; Prognosis

Funding

  1. Deanship of Research, Jordan University of Science and Technology [RN: 126/2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic predisposition to breast cancer (BC) has become one of the most studied aspects of the disease. Advances in the field of cancer research have revealed the role of different genetic polymorphisms within genes of interest in the development of BC. This study aimed to explore the impact of a variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) genetic variant found within the SET and MYND domain containing protein 3 (SMYD3) gene on BC risk in Jordan and examine key clinical and pathological prognostic factors. Genotyping of blood samples from 180 cases with breast cancer and 180 healthy individuals from the Jordanian population was carried out via a combination of PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis. A highly significant association was found at level of genotype (P-value = 0.009) and allele (P-value = 0.0001) between BC development and the VNTR variant in the SMYD3 gene among Jordanian women. Moreover, we found that the VNTR of SMYD3 gene may interfere with BC risk among patients with different immunohistochemistry (IHC) profiles (P-value < 0.05). This study reported that there is a significant correlation between BC development and the VNTR in the SMYD3 gene. These findings can help alleviate the burden of BC in developing countries including Jordan and to fill the gaps in current literature. Since this study was carried out on Jordanian Arabs, more studies on the link between BC and the SMYD3 VNTR variant are recommended to determine this polymorphism's impact on other ethnic groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available