4.7 Article

ReaxFF MD simulations of petroleum coke CO2 gasification examining the S/N removal mechanisms and CO/CO2 reactivity

Journal

FUEL
Volume 257, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116051

Keywords

Petcoke; Reactive force field; Desulfurization; Denitrification; Gasification; Mechanism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51904349, 51374253, 41572144]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0210402]
  3. China Scholarship Council [201606370109]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High S content (> 4 wt%) petroleum coke (petcoke) are used as fuel but are also potential gasification feedstocks (commonly achieved with CO2). Petcoke S and N heteroatoms are in thermally stable structures and thus will contribute to the gasification process during consumption. Here, the removal and transformation of S and N from a petcoke atomistic representation during CO2 gasification were explored via the reactive force field (ReaxFF) NVT simulations. Pyrolysis, reducing, and oxidizing conditions were examined at 3000 K for 250 ps. Under these conditions the slow pyrolysis and slower gasification processes overlap, thus both contribute to the overall gasification behavior. The S/N transformations were: thiophenic-S -> COS, C1-2S -> CnOnS, COnS -> H1-2S, SO2; with pyrrolic and pyridinic N -> CON, CN, NO1-2 -> C1-2O1-2N, COnN, HNO1-2 -> HCN, HNO1-2, NO1-3 (0 < n < 5). The ReaxFF simulations captured the Boudouard reaction with one O atom in CO2 bonding with a C atom then the O-C bond in CO2 breaks after producing CO. The petcoke C atom that bonded with the O atom is then removed producing the second CO molecule. Reactive molecular dynamic simulations such as these are helpful in capturing both the structural diversity (scale challenge) and the complexity of the interactions to elucidate contributions to coke consumption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available